Click here to return to the Bogoroch and Associates Home Page.




Resources

Elcano Acceptance Ltd. v. Richmond, Richmond, Stambler and Mills
Supplemental Reasons
68 O.R. (2d) 641

May 24, 1989.
The Honourable Justice O'Leary

Section 4 of the Interest Act, R.S.C. 1970, c. I-18, provides that where interest is made payable by the terms of any written or printed contract at a percentage for a period less than a year, no interest is recoverable exceeding 5% per annum unless the contract contains an express statement of the annual rate. A solicitor drafted promissory notes for the plaintiffs, four of which provided for interest at an annual rate of 18% before demand and 2% monthly thereafter; the fifth provided for interest at 2% monthly. In none of the notes was the monthly rate of 2% expressed as an annual rate. The plaintiffs, having failed to recover the full interest from the makers of the notes, brought a successful action against the solicitor. Following release of the reasons for judgment against the solicitor, further argument was heard.

Held, judgment affirmed.

It was absurd to suppose that a sophisticated business person would not know the annual equivalent of two per cent per month, but it was impossible to interpret the words of s. 4 to reach any other result than that the notes were not enforceable.

See also:
Elcano Acceptance Ltd. v. Richmond, Richmond, Stambler and Mills – Reasons for Decision

For the full decision, click to download:
Elcano Acceptance Ltd. v. Richmond, Richmond, Stambler and Mills -- Text of Full Decision
(Adobe Acrobat [PDF] file - ~52K)

Get Acrobat Reader   If you don't have the Acrobat Reader, click here to obtain it.